[how the turn tables..... anyways, it's time for a nerd explanation. it's always time for a nerd explanation with her. sorry to jonas specifically.]
It's like... Okay, it's a little bit complicated, but. Every time some kind of quantum experiment happens, it has so many possible different outcomes, right? Like, for example - if somewhere way out in the universe, a star explodes during a supernova, it might seem like it has no impact on us. But the conditions for that explosion and the conditions for it not to explode could both theoretically exist.
So, many worlds interpretation is basically the idea that, like - there are so many different decisions and actions that could split the world into one where that action took place, and one where that action didn't take place. And while it's never been proven, there's nothing essentially disproving that every time something like that occurs, it creates another split. Another world comes into existence where everything was the same up until the moment of that choice, but different afterwards - maybe in small ways, maybe in big ways, depending on what happened.
...alternate universes, then. Or close enough to it. [ it's a lot of words and big concepts, but he's able to absorb that much and apply it to what he can grasp himself.
actions or things said in other timeloops...would those create other worlds somehow? are there other alexes and other jonases out there? ]
Do you think it have to be like a choice that's made? Or do things that are meant to happy have an effect on a world that could split?
Well... If we're talking about the world itself, not choices people make, I don't know whether I would say anything is meant to happen in the first place. Things operate based on entropy more often than not. The world is chaotic, and most of the time things just happen because they happen. But to your question - yes, I think it's definitely possible that if this idea is true at all, it's not just human action that would cause a split.
Yeah. I don't know if that's definitely the cause of all this, but the idea that there are so many places that are similar but with distinct differences makes me think about it, you know?
No. No, it's a really good point. I think it'd be a little easier to doubt it if it were only one or two places, but this is like...three or four now. It's too close.
I will definitely keep that in mind. Even if I feel like that should be "when." As in "when" I have questions, because there's bound to be a lot of them after a while. Especially here.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
No, don't think so. What is it?
no subject
It's like... Okay, it's a little bit complicated, but. Every time some kind of quantum experiment happens, it has so many possible different outcomes, right? Like, for example - if somewhere way out in the universe, a star explodes during a supernova, it might seem like it has no impact on us. But the conditions for that explosion and the conditions for it not to explode could both theoretically exist.
So, many worlds interpretation is basically the idea that, like - there are so many different decisions and actions that could split the world into one where that action took place, and one where that action didn't take place. And while it's never been proven, there's nothing essentially disproving that every time something like that occurs, it creates another split. Another world comes into existence where everything was the same up until the moment of that choice, but different afterwards - maybe in small ways, maybe in big ways, depending on what happened.
no subject
actions or things said in other timeloops...would those create other worlds somehow? are there other alexes and other jonases out there? ]
Do you think it have to be like a choice that's made? Or do things that are meant to happy have an effect on a world that could split?
no subject
Well... If we're talking about the world itself, not choices people make, I don't know whether I would say anything is meant to happen in the first place. Things operate based on entropy more often than not. The world is chaotic, and most of the time things just happen because they happen. But to your question - yes, I think it's definitely possible that if this idea is true at all, it's not just human action that would cause a split.
no subject
Kind of a crazy theory. I don't know how much of it I'd believe if I wasn't seeing it right now, but being here makes it a little harder to ignore.
no subject
no subject
no subject
[nerd]
no subject
You don't think it could get a little overwhelming to learn that much and try to figure it out?
no subject
no subject
Maybe I'll leave it up to you if it ever comes up. I have enough trouble understanding my own world without trying to figure out the rest.
no subject
[all the same:]
But if you've ever got any questions, I'm your girl.
no subject
I will definitely keep that in mind. Even if I feel like that should be "when." As in "when" I have questions, because there's bound to be a lot of them after a while. Especially here.
[ everyone's worlds are so strange sometimes. ]